Utopia Planitia results featured in NASA press release; Planetary Society blog

Screenshot 2016-11-22 13.33.46.png

NASA HQ caught wind of my Utopia results and published a press release here. My blog entry describing the study has been featured on the Planetary Society website, a leader in planetary science coverage, outreach, and advocacy. Happy to see this work reach a wider audience!

UPDATE: News spread across a collection of media sources. I was interviewed by Gizmodo, NY Times, CBC, Inverse, and others. Here’s a list of some articles my work was featured in.

Gizmodo — Enormous Water Ice Deposit Could Help Us Survive on Mars
Engadget — Mars hides a gigantic ice sheet that may help astronauts
Nature World News (Video) — Fast Facts on the Gigantic Ice Sheet Discovered on Mars
New York Times — An Ice Sheet the Size of New Mexico Hidden in Martian Crater
Space.com — Huge Underground Ice Deposit on Mars Is Bigger Than New Mexico
CBC — Ice deposit on Mars holds as much water as Lake Superior, researchers say
Yahoo News — Scientists just discovered a huge body of ice on Mars

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Featured in WeMartians Podcast

Screenshot 2016-11-15 10.31.09.png

Last week I was interviewed for the WeMartians podcast, and it’s published today! Check it out here. I talk about Utopia Planitia, ice, and SHARAD…. as usual.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Widespread, Thick Water Ice found in Utopia Planitia, Mars

My paper on the discovery of a widespread (~375 000 sq km) subsurface water ice deposit in southwestern Utopia Planitia, Mars, was published in GRL a few weeks back. The detailed version is offered in the journal article, but I thought I’d include a higher-level description of what’s up in here.

When you look at Utopia Planitia, there’s a lot of weird stuff going on. For those that aren’t as intimately familiar with martian geography, Utopia Planitia is a huge, ~3300 km diameter basin that formed by impact early in Mars history. It makes up part of what’s known as the northern plains, the more-or-less flat terrain north of the martian dichotomy boundary. For as long as we’ve had good imagery from the region we’ve noticed interesting features on the surface, features like polygonal cracked terrain and oddly-shaped, rimless pits called “scalloped depressions”. When we see features like this on Earth, they’re associated with subsurface ice or permafrost. These features led scientists to believe that this is an ice-rich region of Mars, and inspired my team to examine radar sounding data from the area.

screenshot-2016-11-04-13-00-45-copy

Some examples of “weird” morphologies in western Utopia Planitia. A few of these are highlighted to show the unit is eroding away — the exhuming craters, the peek-a-boo to the underlying unit, and the scalloped depressions are all signs that this material is deflating. The scalloped depressions and the polygonal terrain are specifically what led scientists to believe there’s subsurface ice here. NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS/Stuurman et al., 2016

Our work went in and tested the water ice hypothesis using the ground-penetrating radar instrument on Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, called SHARAD. “SHARAD” stands for SHAllow RADar, and it can theoretically sound up to 1 km into the martian subsurface… so the “shallow” is a bit relative. SHARAD is satellite-based, and operates in the 15-25 MHz range, which prescribes its vertical resolution through different materials (15 m in free space, ~8 m in water ice). There’s a few different things SHARAD can tell us – the geometry of subsurface layering, such as what’s used for stratigraphic analyses at the polar caps. It’s also been used to produce global surface roughness maps. Most relevant for Utopia Planitia, it can be used to find what’s called the “dielectric permittivity”, or the dielectric constant, of the subsurface. That’s what we did in our work.

The radar waves are sent towards Mars from the SHARAD instrument in orbit. Some of that radar wave bounces off the surface, but the rest can penetrate into the ground and occasionally bounces back to the satellite from a subsurface source. These returns can be used to calculate the dielectric constant of the subsurface, which sheds light on the geology of an area. For example, a radar wave travelling through basalt would result in a dielectric constant of 8. Water ice is in the 3.0-3.2 range.

sharad_explanation.png

Quick diagram of how SHARAD works (top), and what its output radargram looks like (bottom). As SHARAD travels in orbit, it sends radar pulses towards Mars. Some of the wave bounces back from the surface, and some penetrates into the ground. If it hits a boundary in the “dielectric” properties (ε1, ε2) in the subsurface, that wave bounces back. Based on these returns, we can measure some material properties of the subsurface. A characteristic dielectric constant for water ice is 3.15. Stuurman, 2016.

To figure out if the dielectric constant of the Utopia Planitia subsurface is consistent with water ice, two main steps were involved. The first involves simply looking at the data. I examined over 600 radargrams over Utopia Planitia, and found subsurface reflectors in about 80 of them. The next was a bit trickier, and that was to estimate how deep the reflectors lie. In order to calculate the dielectric constant, the distance to the subsurface reflector must be known. Fortunately, the reflections spatially correlate with a geologic unit that blankets all surrounding terrain. In the MOLA topographic maps below you can see that the reflectors are all sitting on top of the high-elevation parts in red/orange. When you look at those areas in imagery (like the one with all the weird morphologies above), you can see a striking geologic contact there. The upper stuff is full of polygons, scalloped depressions, exhuming craters, and generally looks really icy (at least to planetary geomorphologists). The material underneath is way more cratered (and thus much older), lighter in colour, and generally doesn’t have any morphologies suggestive of ground ice. It seemed logical to say that this geologic contact was the “dielectric contrast” we were looking for!

Next, we just had to estimate the thickness of that blanketing geologic unit. Fortunately there are a ton of gaps in the middle of it (like shown above), so we simply measured the top and bottom of each of those gaps for our depth-to-reflector values. When we plugged these values into the calculation for the dielectric constant and averaged over the entire area, we obtained a value of 2.8.

grl55022-fig-0002

Examples of subsurface reflectors in western Utopia Planitia. The images on the left are radargrams (upper of each set) and their respective noise simulations (lower of each set). The images on the right are the topographic context for the reflectors we see. There was a clear correlation between the high-elevation areas and the subsurface reflectors. This was crucial for finding the thickness of the geologic unit sounded by the radar instrument, which allowed us to measure its dielectric properties! Stuurman et al., 2016

This value is lower than what is expected for pure water ice. Ideally, pure, solid water ice would have a dielectric of 3.0-3.2. In reality, we often have different materials in the mix. Rock, water ice, and porosity (i.e. air) are in a three way tug-of-war over the dielectric constant result. Porosity pulls it down from 3, towards 1, and lithic content or dust brings it up towards 6-8. My work used a handy ternary diagram from Bramson et al., 2015, to come up with a possible combination of material that is consistent with our result. This amounted to a value of 50-80% water ice, 0-30% rocky content, and 15-50% porosity. So, think of a mostly icy but somewhat porous subsurface, with a bit of dust and lithic material mixed in.

This result implies a volume of water ice around 1.2 times the volume of Lake Superior. This is huge! And when you combine this result with work done by Bramson et al., 2015, which found a similar composition for the subsurface in Arcadia Planitia, it paints a picture of a northern plains rich in subsurface water ice, with widespread areas where these deposits are 10’s of metres thick.

Overall, it’s great to have geophysical support for what the geologists and geomorphologists have been saying for a while – that there’s broad areas of subsurface ice throughout the northern plains thanks to deposition during high obliquity periods on Mars. What our evidence adds to that discussion are constraints on what kind of ice is there, in our case excess ice (i.e. more than 50% ice), and how thick it is throughout this area. The finding of excess ice contributes to the debate on how this water ice was emplaced, narrowing the range of plausible geologic histories for the area. And the constraints on thickness contribute to what we know about high-obliquity deposition of water ice in the mid-latitudes. We can see that the Utopia deposits are roughly twice the thickness of what’s measured in Arcadia Planitia, and much much thicker than what is expected for the latitude-dependent mantle generally (metres). This may speak to differential deposition of water ice during recent high-obliquity cycles, which could potentially act as a constraint for climate modellers down the road.

Finally, this is some of the lowest latitude water ice we’ve found on Mars, down to roughly 40 degrees (the lowest being Deuteronilus Mensae, where we see glacial features down to ~35 degrees). Considering that it’s no longer wacky to suggest that people are going to be visiting Mars someday, I don’t think it’s too radical to suggest that it’s important to characterize our low-latitude water ice deposits as potential resources. If our future missions are going to have astronauts, those astronauts are going to need something to drink. With these results, we see that Utopia Planitia is a great place for that… provided you find a way to deal with all the radiation and dust storms.

Posted in Uncategorized | 10 Comments

2nd Place in the TACC Hackathon!

ho2fxeg

And all I got was this pint glass and a (pretty cool) T-shirt.

This past Saturday, I participated in the Texas Advanced Computing Center Student Hackathon. This was my second Hackathon ever, my first one being the Toronto NASA Space Apps competition in 2013 (where my team Waystation won best software!) and my first where I was doing back-end development.

Our client was a high school administrator responsible for a program that matches college student mentors with classes and teachers in the local area. The existing system involved a lot of Google Docs, copy-and-pasting, and tedious labour. Our objective for the Hackathon was to create a website where mentors can apply to volunteer in the program, and teachers could post positions that need mentors. The process by which mentors are matched with teachers was up to us.

We decided to run with a system where mentors and teachers fill out a simple form (specialty, availability, how far they are willing to travel/what school they are located at) and then a matching algorithm would detect when mentors and teachers are compatible. The administrator would be notified when there is a match, they would review its suitability, and then put the teacher and student in contact with each other. The website also included an administrator-only page that contained statistics and visualizations summarizing the important features in the input data.

We were commended for our back-end and the progress we made with the database systems. Unfortunately, we never had time to connect the front and back-ends together. Our front-end was pretty slick and it’s a shame we never completed the puzzle! In the end we lost because while we thought the administrator wanted to be part of the system, the winning team emphasized the role of the mentors/teachers with a system involving log-ins and personal profiles. It came as a surprise to our team that the client wanted log-in functionality as well as the ability to add more features later. The biggest lesson for me here is that you need to have a solid understanding of what the client is asking for! Everyone on our team jumped right into coding and got too caught up in linking all these little bits of code together. I think if we had taken the time to communicate with the client one-on-one and had a better high-level plan for our website, we could have easily taken first!

Overall myself and my team are happy we participated. None of us had ever developed a website or written in Javascript before. This was only my second time seriously using GitHub, and my first time working with NoSQL databases. We were also under-staffed (all other groups had 5 people where we had only 4), which was both a blessing and a curse. I’m grateful for the team I had, and for TACC for putting the event together.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment